Shoplifting Case Study
Whether the defendant's concealment of merchandise was sufficient to prove the intent to shoplift.
The court affirmed the shoplifting conviction, finding that the defendant's act of placing merchandise in a bag and walking past the point of sale without paying was sufficient to prove the intent to shoplift. The court held that concealment of merchandise beyond the point of sale creates a presumption of intent to shoplift.
Virginia's shoplifting statute creates a presumption of intent from concealment of merchandise. D.J. Rivera challenges shoplifting charges by scrutinizing the circumstances of the alleged concealment — including whether the defendant had already paid for the merchandise, whether the concealment was accidental, or whether the defendant intended to pay at a different register.
This case involves § 18.2-103 of the Virginia Code. For a full analysis of how this statute applies to your case, consult with D.J. Rivera.
D.J. Rivera applies the lessons of cases like this one to defend clients throughout Richmond and Northern Virginia. Free consultation available 24/7.
Get Your Free Consultation