Sexual Assault Case Study
Whether the DNA evidence was properly admitted and whether it was sufficient to identify the defendant as the perpetrator.
The court affirmed the conviction, finding that the DNA evidence was properly admitted and that the statistical probability of a random match — one in several billion — was sufficient to identify the defendant as the source of the DNA. The court held that DNA evidence, properly authenticated, is admissible and highly probative.
DNA evidence is powerful but not infallible. D.J. Rivera retains independent DNA experts to challenge the collection, preservation, and analysis of DNA evidence in sexual assault cases. Issues such as contamination, mixed DNA profiles, and statistical interpretation can significantly undermine the prosecution's DNA evidence.
This case involves § 18.2-61 of the Virginia Code. For a full analysis of how this statute applies to your case, consult with D.J. Rivera.
D.J. Rivera applies the lessons of cases like this one to defend clients throughout Richmond and Northern Virginia. Free consultation available 24/7.
Get Your Free Consultation