Homicide & Murder Case Study
Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove premeditation for first-degree murder.
The court reversed the first-degree murder conviction, finding that the evidence was insufficient to prove premeditation. The court held that premeditation requires proof that the defendant formed the intent to kill before the act, and that the brief time between the formation of intent and the act — while legally sufficient — was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt on the facts of this case.
The distinction between first-degree murder (premeditated) and second-degree murder (unpremeditated) is critical — first-degree murder carries a mandatory minimum of 20 years, while second-degree murder carries 5–40 years. D.J. Rivera challenges premeditation in every first-degree murder case, arguing that the evidence supports at most second-degree murder or manslaughter.
This case involves § 18.2-32 of the Virginia Code. For a full analysis of how this statute applies to your case, consult with D.J. Rivera.
D.J. Rivera applies the lessons of cases like this one to defend clients throughout Richmond and Northern Virginia. Free consultation available 24/7.
Get Your Free Consultation