Computer Crimes Case Study
Whether the defendant's use of a VPN to mask his IP address was evidence of consciousness of guilt.
The court held that the use of a VPN, standing alone, is not evidence of consciousness of guilt — VPNs are widely used for legitimate privacy purposes. The court excluded the VPN evidence as unduly prejudicial, finding that its probative value was substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice.
The use of privacy tools such as VPNs, encrypted messaging apps, and anonymous browsing is not inherently evidence of criminal intent. D.J. Rivera challenges the prosecution's use of privacy tool evidence in computer crime cases, arguing that these tools are used by millions of people for legitimate privacy purposes.
This case involves § 18.2-152.3 of the Virginia Code. For a full analysis of how this statute applies to your case, consult with D.J. Rivera.
D.J. Rivera applies the lessons of cases like this one to defend clients throughout Richmond and Northern Virginia. Free consultation available 24/7.
Get Your Free Consultation