Computer Crimes Case Study
Whether the defendant's use of a work computer for personal purposes constituted computer fraud under § 18.2-152.3.
The court dismissed the computer fraud charge, finding that the defendant's use of a work computer for personal purposes — while a violation of company policy — did not constitute computer fraud under § 18.2-152.3. The court held that computer fraud requires proof of an intent to defraud or obtain property by false pretenses, not merely unauthorized use.
Not every violation of a computer use policy constitutes a crime. D.J. Rivera challenges computer fraud charges by scrutinizing whether the defendant's conduct involved the intent to defraud or obtain property by false pretenses — distinguishing between criminal computer fraud and mere policy violations.
This case involves § 18.2-152.3 of the Virginia Code. For a full analysis of how this statute applies to your case, consult with D.J. Rivera.
D.J. Rivera applies the lessons of cases like this one to defend clients throughout Richmond and Northern Virginia. Free consultation available 24/7.
Get Your Free Consultation