Computer Crimes Case Study
Whether the defendant's online solicitation of a minor was proven where the 'minor' was actually an undercover officer.
The court affirmed the conviction, finding that Virginia's online solicitation of a minor statute applies even where the 'minor' is actually an undercover officer. The court held that the defendant's intent — not the actual age of the person solicited — is the relevant inquiry.
Online solicitation of a minor cases frequently involve undercover police operations. D.J. Rivera challenges these cases by scrutinizing the conduct of the undercover officer for entrapment, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence of the defendant's intent, and examining the digital communications for context that undermines the prosecution's interpretation.
This case involves § 18.2-374.3 of the Virginia Code. For a full analysis of how this statute applies to your case, consult with D.J. Rivera.
D.J. Rivera applies the lessons of cases like this one to defend clients throughout Richmond and Northern Virginia. Free consultation available 24/7.
Get Your Free Consultation