Computer Crimes Case Study
Whether the defendant's installation of spyware on the alleged victim's computer constituted computer invasion of privacy under § 18.2-152.5.
The court affirmed the conviction, finding that the defendant's installation of spyware — which recorded the alleged victim's keystrokes and captured screenshots — constituted computer invasion of privacy. The court held that § 18.2-152.5 prohibits the use of a computer to examine personal information about another person without their knowledge or consent.
Computer invasion of privacy cases often involve complex technical evidence about how software was installed and what data it captured. D.J. Rivera's computer engineering background allows him to challenge the prosecution's technical evidence — scrutinizing how the software was installed, what data it actually captured, and whether the defendant had authorization to install it.
This case involves § 18.2-152.5 of the Virginia Code. For a full analysis of how this statute applies to your case, consult with D.J. Rivera.
D.J. Rivera applies the lessons of cases like this one to defend clients throughout Richmond and Northern Virginia. Free consultation available 24/7.
Get Your Free Consultation