Computer Crimes Case Study
Whether the defendant's use of another person's login credentials to access a computer system constituted unauthorized access under § 18.2-152.3.
The court affirmed the conviction, finding that using another person's credentials without their permission constitutes unauthorized access under § 18.2-152.3. The court held that authorization is personal — permission granted to one person does not extend to another person who uses that person's credentials.
Authorization is the central issue in most computer crime cases. D.J. Rivera — with his B.S. in Computer Engineering and background at iCyberLaw — challenges the prosecution's interpretation of 'authorization,' arguing that the defendant had implicit or explicit permission to access the system. The technical complexity of authorization in modern computer systems provides significant room for defense.
This case involves § 18.2-152.3 of the Virginia Code. For a full analysis of how this statute applies to your case, consult with D.J. Rivera.
D.J. Rivera applies the lessons of cases like this one to defend clients throughout Richmond and Northern Virginia. Free consultation available 24/7.
Get Your Free Consultation