Burglary Case Study
Whether the defendant's prior conviction for burglary was properly used to enhance the current sentence.
The court reversed the sentence enhancement, finding that the prior conviction did not qualify as a predicate offense for the enhancement because it was a conviction under a different state's statute that did not have the same elements as Virginia burglary. The court held that sentence enhancements based on prior convictions must be strictly construed.
Sentence enhancements based on prior convictions must be carefully scrutinized. D.J. Rivera challenges the use of prior convictions for sentence enhancement purposes, particularly where the prior conviction was under a different state's law or involved a different offense than the current charge.
This case involves § 18.2-89 of the Virginia Code. For a full analysis of how this statute applies to your case, consult with D.J. Rivera.
D.J. Rivera applies the lessons of cases like this one to defend clients throughout Richmond and Northern Virginia. Free consultation available 24/7.
Get Your Free Consultation