Assault & Battery Case Study
Whether the defendant's claim of self-defense was sufficient to negate the intent element of assault and battery.
The court reversed the conviction, finding that the evidence supported the defendant's claim of self-defense. The court held that a defendant who reasonably believes they are in imminent danger of bodily harm may use reasonable force in self-defense, and that this negates the 'unlawful' element of assault and battery.
This case is a significant win for the self-defense doctrine in Virginia assault cases. It demonstrates that a well-developed self-defense argument — supported by evidence of the alleged victim's aggression, the defendant's reasonable belief of imminent harm, and the proportionality of the response — can result in reversal of an assault conviction. D.J. Rivera develops self-defense arguments in every appropriate assault case.
This case involves § 18.2-57 of the Virginia Code. For a full analysis of how this statute applies to your case, consult with D.J. Rivera.
D.J. Rivera applies the lessons of cases like this one to defend clients throughout Richmond and Northern Virginia. Free consultation available 24/7.
Get Your Free Consultation